---

What is the Nature of God in Hinduism?

Much Recommended - Nature of reality in Hinduism

One of the recurring debates in modern times is whether Hinduism is monotheistic, polytheistic, or pantheistic. These terms come from the Judeo-Christian context — rooted in theological battles between those who believed in “one God” and those who worshipped “many gods.”

But trying to fit the Hindu view of divinity into these Western categories creates deep confusion. None of these labels can truly capture the profound and nuanced understanding that our tradition offers about the nature of God.

In the previous blogs we have discussed broadly about the nature of God in hinduism God or Gods? - 01 where we saw how each category has an inherent limitation while describing the ultimate reality based on Hindu frameworks.

for ex. In the monotheistic worldview, there is one God — but that God does not manifest in multiple forms or energies. There are no devas, no hierarchy of divine personalities. And the reality is not just only impersonal (of no form) but personal at the same time.

Thus in this blog we will discuss on what actually is the nature of reality in Hinduism?

The Problem with Western Labels

Many Hindus themselves get divided over this question, some insist that Hinduism is polytheistic, others claim it is monotheistic. But this division arises because people no longer study our śāstras deeply.

We do not have a single book or one fixed form of God. Our knowledge system was once deeply structured — with a traditional way to study, interpret, and realize truth. When that system was neglected, we began relying on fragmented sources: online summaries, YouTube talks, or scholars who themselves are trying to map our systems onto Western categories.

In reality, none of these terms — monotheism, polytheism, or pantheism — defines Hindu philosophy accurately.

The Concept of Tattva — The Essence of Reality

If one were to summarize our understanding in a single word, it would be Tattva (from Tat, meaning “That”). “Tattva” literally means thatness — the essence or the fundamental reality of everything.

This essence is not just the material cause of things (like saying the essence of a chair is wood). It goes deeper — to the original source of all causes, the ultimate substratum of existence. That ultimate source is Brahman, the all-pervading consciousness.

Thus, our philosophy is based on the idea that the ultimate reality (Tattva) is non-dual consciousness.

"The tattva-vedi who knows the Absolute Truth (tattva) call this nondual consciousness(advaya-jnana) Brahman, Paramātmā or Bhagavān." (SB 1.2.11)

Beyond Concepts — The Realization of Tattva

All these categories — monotheism, polytheism, pantheism — are intellectual concepts born from the material mind. But the Tattva or Brahman that Hinduism speaks of is not a mental construct. It is a realization — something experienced by those who have aligned themselves with that reality.

Our scriptures are not speculative; they are based on direct experience. The sages who realized the Absolute shared their insights through language so others could also verify and experience it themselves while living. It is not a destination reached after death and hence un-verifiable.

That’s why words like Brahman, Paramātmā, Īśvara, and Bhagavān each carry unique meanings. Replacing them all with the single word “God” erases the distinctions that are essential to understanding our philosophy.

Why We Say “Non-Dual,” Not “Monistic”

We use the term non-dual (Advaita), not monistic. Why? Because “monistic” suggests there is only one and therefore denies diversity.

“Non-dual,” on the other hand, means that although reality is one, it accommodates variety within itself. The Absolute is conscious and also manifests diversity. Thus, the One is not opposed to the many — the many are expressions of the One.

This subtle understanding simply cannot be translated into Western religious terms.

The Need to Use Our Own Vocabulary

When scholars try to fit Hinduism into Western frameworks, they end up distorting it. Many even do it to get academic acceptance — to publish papers, get grants, or fit into Western categories like “monotheism” or “pantheism.”

But in doing so, they begin to think in those categories and lose touch with our original worldview.

It’s time to move past that inferiority complex. We no longer need to fit into their frameworks. Instead, we must explain our tradition in our own vocabulary — rooted in śāstra and realization, not in foreign theological boxes.

Conclusion: The Nature of God in Hinduism

The Hindu vision of divinity is unique. It is not monotheistic, not polytheistic, not pantheistic — it is Tattvic, rooted in the realization of non-dual consciousness that manifests in infinite diversity.

Everything originates from That, exists in That, and ultimately merges back into That. This Thatness — Tattva — is the essence of our understanding of God.